『漫游』酷论坛>『动漫主题讨论区』>贫乏《贫乏姐妹物语》

Hermes@2006-07-02 01:24

連作者自己都在YY了...[/han]
引用

downa@2006-07-02 01:29

说明他也邪恶了....XPP

不知说了多少次。主帖到处都是论点吗？
某某有某特色=某向？
======================
转吧,转吧,你华丽的转移话题吧....[/TX]
引用

鶴屋@2006-07-02 01:29

引用
最初由 downa 发布
我似乎能理解这种思维模式了。
“你终于让我提了!?”意思是我没说他可以提，他就不能提。
同理，我没提所谓“治愈”的问题，就等于“治愈”不存在。

我还没提到原子论呢，原子不存在？

==================================
又来了,前面一再强调那百合特色不是自己论点的是谁!?
前面我提了又提,你否定了又否定,而现在你终于承认了肯面对这个问题了,却又想转移话题!?
我说LZ这样做人是不厚道地....:o
好吧如果你不想谈片子本身的主题以及对你那句特色是百合作出解释的话我们就别在玩了,我前面的引导工作算白作而你那句:
你可以提，但是不要说我提了这个“论点”、又在“ＹＹ”这样的话
我也当没看见行了吧..."百合是这片的特色",可以了吧!?


What I was trying to say is yuri is one aspect of it. It's a simple fact, just for your information, NOT an argumentation to this thread. This, however, can not be interpreted as I denied that yuri is not an aspect of it.

The argumentation I want to make is it's a second-class animation. Period.
引用

鶴屋@2006-07-02 01:31

引用
最初由 downa 发布
说明他也邪恶了....XPP

不知说了多少次。主帖到处都是论点吗？
某某有某特色=某向？
======================
转吧,转吧,你华丽的转移话题吧....[/TX]


“在我看来本作的百合就是自己YY的,作者根本没有这方面的暗示....”

Feel free to take this back.
引用

downa@2006-07-02 01:32

转英文学习了!?[/han]
引用

漫畫懶人@2006-07-02 01:32

互射12碼了.........
兩位還在戰不看球?
引用

downa@2006-07-02 01:37

“在我看来本作的百合就是自己YY的,作者根本没有这方面的暗示....”

Feel free to take this back
===================================
有人帮你解围了就在这里装B!?想想自己到底前面说过什么实质性阐述你那百合是特色的的话吧!再来装也不迟...[/TX]
我一向尊重事实所以既然作者现在邪恶了那就承认,但之前呢!?
引用

鶴屋@2006-07-02 01:41

引用
最初由 downa 发布
转英文学习了!?[/han]


Because you're confused with "论点". I'm trying to tell you a "论点", or argumentation, is the main point you want to make in your essay. To proof it, you need evidence, and reasoning (proof the argumentation with evidence).

But a simple fact is just a simple fact to the essay. You can't say, hey, this is the argumentation. You're missing the (main) point.
引用

downa@2006-07-02 01:45

Because you're confused with "论点". I'm trying to tell you a "论点", or argumentation, is the main point you want to make in your essay. To proof it, you need evidence, and reasoning (proof the argumentation with evidence).

But a simple fact is just a simple fact to the essay. You can't say, hey, this is the argumentation. You're missing the (main) point.
================================================
又在玩文字游戏!?不过别人都替你解围了,我也没什么可多说的....就一句话你从头到底没有回答过我的质疑...:p
引用

鶴屋@2006-07-02 01:46

引用
最初由 downa 发布
“在我看来本作的百合就是自己YY的,作者根本没有这方面的暗示....”

Feel free to take this back
===================================
有人帮你解围了就在这里装B!?想想自己到底前面说过什么实质性阐述你那百合是特色的的话吧!再来装也不迟...[/TX]
我一向尊重事实所以既然作者现在邪恶了那就承认,但之前呢!?


You're so bold. I merely presented a simple fact in main thread, that's it. It's a simple fact, not the argumentation. Since how many times you could understand it?

Before that? Read Volumn one, there's an extra story at the end of the book. That's a prototype, which means it's before the regular series began. That is the proof. The artist was "evil" at the very beginning.
引用

Hermes@2006-07-02 01:47

母親並非動畫原創
漫畫確實存在，只不過不像動畫一般成了幽靈
引用

鶴屋@2006-07-02 01:47

引用
最初由 downa 发布
Because you're confused with "论点". I'm trying to tell you a "论点", or argumentation, is the main point you want to make in your essay. To proof it, you need evidence, and reasoning (proof the argumentation with evidence).

But a simple fact is just a simple fact to the essay. You can't say, hey, this is the argumentation. You're missing the (main) point.
================================================
又在玩文字游戏!?不过别人都替你解围了,我也没什么可多说的....就一句话你从头到底没有回答过我的质疑...:p


what shall I do with a kitbag-challenger?
引用

Alyssachia@2006-07-02 01:52

这个X2已经作出来了
引用

luckyjie@2006-07-02 01:54

这个有下载了吗
引用

downa@2006-07-02 02:01

母親並非動畫原創
漫畫確實存在，只不過不像動畫一般成了幽靈
=========================
这是第几话的!?
话说我要第2卷中文啊.....T__T!!

what shall I do with a kitbag-challenger?
============================================
在事实面前俺也没有什么好说的...你慢慢享受吧....:p
引用

«45678910»共10页

| TOP