『漫游』酷论坛>『海外生活』>有人看了Troy或者Shrek 2 ..
clairee@2004-05-27 11:08
覺得Shrek 2應該會很不錯吧
雖然還沒看
不過應該差不到哪去才是
JanusWang@2004-05-28 03:18
明天去看the Day after Tomorrow!
最近每个周末都看电影，哈哈，下个周末是Harry Potter，下下下个周末是the Notebook
Harmatia@2004-05-28 05:41
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0528/p14s02-almo.html
New York is toast. Again.
'The Day After Tomorrow' is a disaster of a movie.
By David Sterritt | Film critic of The Christian Science Monitor
Before its release, "The Day After Tomorrow" prompted argument over whether its science is any good. Now that it's on screen, the argument can shift to where it belongs - whether the filmmaking is any good.
It isn't.
I don't mean filmmaking in the visual-effect sense. Almost anyone can cook up walloping images these days, given a big enough budget. The movie succeeds well in this area, especially when it takes an orbiting satellite's perspective to show a fast-freezing Earth, entering a new Ice Age as a paradoxical result of global warming.
It's the global-warming topic that has grabbed headlines for the film, which takes for granted the idea that unchecked industrial activity could cause catastrophic climate changes. Debating the science behind the story is beside the point, though, since there isn't any. The screenplay uses global warming as a given, offering no facts or theories to back up its position.
From this conceptual starting point it proceeds to spin a science-fiction scenario wherein heat-circulation patterns cause a perfect storm that goes global within days. This is as implausible as it is hyperbolic, at least the way director Roland Emmerich tells it.
What slides into deep-freeze most quickly and permanently are any emotions you might have expected to feel during such a traumatic tale. The producers have assembled a talented but hapless cast, led by Dennis Quaid as a climatologist who slogs through what might be the end of the world in order to reach his son (Jake Gyllenhaal) for no sensible reason except that life-threatening treks are expected in stories like this.
Along the way, the characters utter some of the clumsiest dialogue in ages. Rarely have I heard a huge preview audience laugh so often in the wrong places.
All this amounts to a badly wasted opportunity, since global warming is a serious issue that deserves thoughtful treatment.
So stay home and read a scientific journal instead. This is a disaster movie that lives up to its label.
• Rated PG-13; contains sci-fi peril and death.
JanusWang@2004-05-28 06:04
看电影就是图个乐趣，那么专业的分析干吗，要是那样，没有电影可以看了。
夏然@2004-05-28 06:17
TROY我觉得不错！那服装，那建筑，那气氛……味道十足！
演员嘛，对BRAD没什么兴趣，不过演的很好，小莱悲惨了点，谁让他演的就是那个选了阿佛罗迪特的情痴帕里斯呢，那场打了败仗抱着哥哥的腿的样子还是非常入戏的。
shrek 2 还没上啊。。。。不过一定会去看的。最大的期待也是HARRY POTTER，小天狼星啊。。。。
«1234»共4页
| TOP