引用第1楼ljwing于2011-07-30 19:49发表的 :
DiAVC 出1.2版了
部分H.264解码器速度相关测试(9楼、34楼 更新)
upyzl@2011-07-29 09:24
9楼、34楼 更新(右上有楼层直达)Decoder | Clip HP (7A 15:30~16:30) | Clip Air (10 6:00~7:00) | ||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | Avg | CPU | 1 | 2 | 3 | Avg | CPU | |
FFDshow r3949 x64 clsid MSVC2010 | 175.8991 | 175.9973 | 176.5623 | 176.1529 | 99% | 91.9021 | 91.6327 | 91.8859 | 91.8069 | 89% |
FFDshow r3949 x86 clsid MSVC2010 | 176.5986 | 178.3660 | 178.1356 | 177.7001 | 98% | 96.4209 | 96.6743 | 96.7737 | 96.6230 | 89% |
FFDshow r3949 x86 xvidvideo ICL12 | 182.0981 | 183.0330 | 182.9451 | 182.6921 | 97% | 97.6270 | 96.0647 | 97.8474 | 97.1797 | 89% |
FFDshow r3949 x86 xvidvideo ICL12 DXVA | 128.3970 | 128.5200 | 128.3990 | 128.4387 | 4% | 47.7970 | 47.7080 | 47.7090 | 47.7380 | 2% |
CoreAVC 2.5.5 x64 | 185.0371 | 187.6385 | 186.2121 | 186.2959 | 95% | 103.7265 | 103.8780 | 104.0836 | 103.8960 | 93% |
CoreAVC 2.5.5 x86 | 186.4933 | 187.4608 | 186.7922 | 186.9154 | 94% | 105.8563 | 106.4466 | 106.1848 | 106.1626 | 92% |
CoreAVC 2.5.5 x86 DXVA | 128.9340 | 128.8820 | 128.8740 | 128.8967 | 9% | 47.8300 | 47.7800 | 47.7820 | 47.7973 | 5% |
CoreAVC 2.5.5 x86 CUDA | 123.6191 | 124.9794 | 124.9830 | 124.5272 | 16% | 43.7240 | 43.8329 | 43.8459 | 43.8009 | 10% |
LAV CUVID 0.9 x64 | 126.5316 | 127.9815 | 127.9428 | 127.4853 | 14% | 47.6258 | 47.7467 | 47.7651 | 47.7125 | 12% |
LAV CUVID 0.9 x86 | 126.2190 | 128.1213 | 128.1332 | 127.4912 | 10% | 47.6234 | 47.7589 | 47.7669 | 47.7164 | 9% |
Microsoft DTV-DVD Video Decoder x86 DXVA | 129.1860 | 129.1980 | 129.1950 | 129.1930 | 13% | 47.9390 | 47.9310 | 47.9360 | 47.9353 | 6% |
DiAVC x64 Free 1.2 | 211.9292 | 213.6046 | 213.0770 | 212.8703 | 100% | 121.4670 | 122.0561 | 121.5459 | 121.6897 | 99% |
ljwing@2011-07-30 19:49
DiAVC 出1.2版了06_taro@2011-07-31 09:26
为啥FFD的DXVA用icl12版,软解测试用MSVC版……upyzl@2011-07-31 21:52
更新DiAVC,由于测试时进程什么的可能跟之前不是完全相同(虽然我印象中开的东西应该是一样的),所以也许会有些许误差,不过仅从速度上看,DiAVC的优势毫无疑问是很明显的引用引用第1楼ljwing于2011-07-30 19:49发表的 :
DiAVC 出1.2版了
引用引用第2楼06_taro于2011-07-31 09:26发表的 :
为啥FFD的DXVA用icl12版,软解测试用MSVC版……
06_taro@2011-07-31 23:45
哦我眼殘了……upyzl@2011-08-01 06:48
忘记说明一点了,关于解码器的设置roozhou@2011-08-01 19:00
为什么拿来测试的码率这么低?upyzl@2011-08-01 23:22
引用引用第6楼roozhou于2011-08-01 19:00发表的 :
为什么拿来测试的码率这么低?
回 7楼(upyzl) 的帖子
nuomi1@2011-08-02 00:18
我垃圾CPU+更垃圾GPU,ffmpeg-mt解碼(完美者解碼20110603),低碼率確實沒有很大的說服力(不說沒有,還是有一定的說服力,最近不少“高壓”產物),上高碼率之後可以看得出。upyzl@2011-08-02 08:30
增加一个样片测试roozhou@2011-08-02 18:48
怎么不用BD-remux的流测试呢?upyzl@2011-08-02 20:19
引用引用第10楼roozhou于2011-08-02 18:48发表的 :
怎么不用BD-remux的流测试呢?
mawen1250@2011-08-03 12:12
用2160p鸭子测试吧……upyzl@2011-08-03 14:41
引用引用第12楼mawen1250于2011-08-03 12:12发表的 :
用2160p鸭子测试吧……
upyzl@2011-08-03 19:33
引用引用第12楼mawen1250于2011-08-03 12:12发表的 :
用2160p鸭子测试吧……