5月1号.......Matroska........|『DVDRip技术研修室』 - 『漫游』酷论坛

转自doom9:
1. Variable frame rate video.
2. An actual set of specs.
3. Active developers.
4. Opensource tools.
5. Defined specs for every informational MP3 ID3 tag, and almost every other tag in other containers including APEv2, Ogg, RIFF, AVI, Extended RIFF, WMP9, CD-Text, and a few others.
6. More extensible for the future. (This is subjective as the future isn't here, but it was a top priority to ensure anything* could be stored in Matroksa for the next 10 years.)
7. matroska can hold any number of audio streams, even if different audio codecs and/or sampling rates were used. Also the DShow filter will support this ( hopefully this year still )
8. matroska can deal with any VfW and/or ACM codecs out there, without having to know what codec it actually is ( see WMV9 VCM )
9. matroska has defined 'native' MPEG4 modes, for simple, simple avanced and advanced mode
10. matroska is supporting b-frames natively, without simply taking the VfW hackery with dummy frames and the like. In addition to that 5 more frame types are defined for future use
11. matroska specs do support h.264 with all the advanced features like improved streaming using NALUs ( video packet distribution with a priority ) already
12. matroska files can be stuffed with additional EDC/ECC(FEC) elements in a very flexible way, for enhanced mode2form2 or UDP streaming support

引用

xxp@2003-04-14 12:34

"10. matroska is supporting b-frames natively, without simply taking the VfW hackery with dummy frames and the like. In addition to that 5 more frame types are defined for future use
11. matroska specs do support h.264 with all the advanced features like improved streaming using NALUs ( video packet distribution with a priority ) already"

这2个不错不错，就不知道速度和质量如何。。。。。。。。

引用

supercase@2003-04-14 21:53

这个是……什么类型的软件？

给个类似软件的名称。

引用

Ronnier@2003-04-14 23:45

h.264？
估计这个速度……:(

引用

muddle@2003-04-15 00:09

1. Variable frame rate video..........

这是一个很好的功能，但是我看到后就头痛，到时候做出来的东西再编辑的随意性估计不是一般的差了。。。。。。。。。

引用

xxp@2003-04-16 13:05

相信是不能再编辑了。。。。。。。