搜索 社区服务 统计排行 帮助
发帖 回复
« 返回列表
«123»
共3页
上一主题下一主题
  • 3149阅读
  • 33回复

Are you conservative, liberal, or neutral?

 楼层直达
emb422
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-03-19
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
459
只看楼主 更多操作 楼主  发表于: 2004-01-19
I am just curious about whether people here are more conservative or more liberal...

Conservative is "right". In US conservetive side would be the Republican party. Conservative parties value order over freedom, and freedom over equality.
The extreme right would be totalitarian parties such as the Nazi.

Liberal is "left". In US it would be the Democratic Party. These parties value freedom over order, and equality over freedom. They are also known as the progressives, because they bring social changes.
The far left are the radicals, who are technically socialists.
The extreme left are the communists.

This is not by anyway meant to be offensive to anyone... it's just a servey.
分享到 淘江湖 新浪 QQ微博 QQ空间 开心 人人 豆瓣 网易微博 百度 鲜果 白社会 飞信
'vanitas vanitatum dixit Ecclesiastes vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas. '
-Ecclesiastes 1:2

'Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature'
-Immanuel Kant

'己所不欲，勿施於人。'
-仲尼
回复 引用
举报顶端
emb422
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-03-19
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
459
只看该作者 33楼 发表于: 2004-01-29
引用
最初由 edlzh 发布

政治取向应该是不同政党对社会各个方面所持的不同观点，不同政党执政，政策就会不同。

在这反面企鹅姐是专家。。

Percisely!
Politics is all about different opionions, differnt interst groups, differnt ideas, and how these differences affect peole and statesmans in making choices.
'vanitas vanitatum dixit Ecclesiastes vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas. '
-Ecclesiastes 1:2

'Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature'
-Immanuel Kant

'己所不欲，勿施於人。'
-仲尼
回复 引用
举报顶端
edlzh
级别: 新手上路
注册时间:
2003-03-22
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
269
只看该作者 32楼 发表于: 2004-01-29
引用
最初由 霸王哆啦 发布
政治取向么？republican和democracy之间有区别么？自由经济政策两党似乎没有分歧，在诸如穆斯林女学生要不要戴头巾或是同性恋可不可以结婚这样的问题上的不一致基本上等同猪杂汤里的生菜。

政治取向应该是不同政党对社会各个方面所持的不同观点，不同政党执政，政策就会不同。

在这反面企鹅姐是专家。。
回复 引用
举报顶端
emb422
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-03-19
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
459
只看该作者 31楼 发表于: 2004-01-28
Economics, politics, and even life is all about making choices...
The world we live in is not perfect--resources are scarce.
There is no way that everything can come directly and immediately--we have to make choices, and pay the opportunity cost.

It is quite understandable that most people want to see results as quick as it can happen. But, think about the future! Politicians make policies with immediate resultts and make tons of promises to win election by "popularity contest". True Statesman tend to treat things in long term, despite how these things will affect the results of the election.
'vanitas vanitatum dixit Ecclesiastes vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas. '
-Ecclesiastes 1:2

'Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature'
-Immanuel Kant

'己所不欲，勿施於人。'
-仲尼
回复 引用
举报顶端
1111111
级别: 新手上路
注册时间:
2001-11-21
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
245
只看该作者 30楼 发表于: 2004-01-27
we don't like indirect things....
we want direct benefits
1111111
回复 引用
举报顶端
emb422
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-03-19
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
459
只看该作者 29楼 发表于: 2004-01-26
The tax-cut?

Actually, tax-cuts benefit the middle and the lower class indirectly... What it does is put more money into the economy by reducing the most from the higher class. In turn, the higher class will have more money to create more job opportunities or to manueaver better in business, thus saving the economy.

As a fiscal policy, tax-cut usually doesn't take full effect for 2 to 5 years...
'vanitas vanitatum dixit Ecclesiastes vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas. '
-Ecclesiastes 1:2

'Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature'
-Immanuel Kant

'己所不欲，勿施於人。'
-仲尼
回复 引用
举报顶端
jingwen
级别: 骑士
注册时间:
2003-01-28
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
1420
只看该作者 28楼 发表于: 2004-01-26
引用
最初由 霸王哆啦 发布
政治取向么？republican和democracy之间有区别么？自由经济政策两党似乎没有分歧，在诸如穆斯林女学生要不要戴头巾或是同性恋可不可以结婚这样的问题上的不一致基本上等同猪杂汤里的生菜。
我觉得在经济政策上也有所不同的. 不过其政治本质是相同的. 资本主义政党都是维护资产阶级利益的. 富人当然维护富人的利益, 那些政党领导人,那些议员哪个不是钱堆出来的? 所谓的竞选筹款等同于公开受贿收贿. 知道美国的Spoils System吗? 从Democratist的发起人Andrew Jackson就开始了.
世情薄，人情恶，雨送黄昏花易落
http://blog.sina.com.cn/azuretao

欢迎来踩文并撒花，谢谢~
http://www.jjwxc.net/onebook.php?novelid=315221

回复 引用
举报顶端
1111111
级别: 新手上路
注册时间:
2001-11-21
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
245
只看该作者 27楼 发表于: 2004-01-26
no I did not watch the state of the union address
tax cut...for the rich only
1111111
回复 引用
举报顶端
jingwen
级别: 骑士
注册时间:
2003-01-28
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
1420
只看该作者 26楼 发表于: 2004-01-25
Did anybody watched George B. Bush's State of The Nation address? Mr. Bush was so happy with his so-called Tax-Cut, but I don't see any good of it to the common people, don't see the economy revival that he's talking about. hypocritical person.
世情薄，人情恶，雨送黄昏花易落
http://blog.sina.com.cn/azuretao

欢迎来踩文并撒花，谢谢~
http://www.jjwxc.net/onebook.php?novelid=315221

回复 引用
举报顶端
edlzh
级别: 新手上路
注册时间:
2003-03-22
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
269
只看该作者 25楼 发表于: 2004-01-25
引用
最初由 Harmatia 发布


赫赫，这样可不好啊
法西斯PARTY也可以做你说的那些事情的

说的有道理，或许就是因为这个法西斯才走上历史舞台的。也因为这个不能保准在非常时期法西斯再次扮演重要角色。。。。
回复 引用
举报顶端
emb422
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-03-19
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
459
只看该作者 24楼 发表于: 2004-01-25
well, communist party value "equality" above all, so therefore it is to the far left.

Compare communist parties with fascist parties, of course communist parties offer more freedom...
'vanitas vanitatum dixit Ecclesiastes vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas. '
-Ecclesiastes 1:2

'Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature'
-Immanuel Kant

'己所不欲，勿施於人。'
-仲尼
回复 引用
举报顶端
kouhoutei
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-12-29
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
331
只看该作者 23楼 发表于: 2004-01-24
U said that the "left" value freedom more than order,but communist party value order more than freedom.
回复 引用
举报顶端
1111111
级别: 新手上路
注册时间:
2001-11-21
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
245
只看该作者 22楼 发表于: 2004-01-22
none of my friends play strategy game....
they play gunbound .... or no game at all...

Can you turn off the pause feature....it would be too annoying for multiplayer...

PS: In Transportation Tycoon (OLD...) I pause a lot....
Never try multiplayer cause I cannot find ppl...
1111111
回复 引用
举报顶端
emb422
级别: 侠客
注册时间:
2003-03-19
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
459
只看该作者 21楼 发表于: 2004-01-22
引用
最初由 1111111 发布


...it is too hard...
I have revolts all over the place...
I create armies just to suppress revolts (this make me #1 in military rating)..
To change the people from labors or farmers to clerks or craftmen are very bothersome.... the computer should do that automatically (but it won't so I have to find the provience and change myself...)

After 37hr, I finally finish 100yr... and prestige is not high enough...for getting #1....
then I use cheat to get to #1...nothing special, no movie, etc.
I think this game is more fun with multiplayer...but the servers always empty


You got to play one of the Paradox's game online!
It's fun, as long as you can get 2 or 3 friends to play with you.
But, remember that too many people can make the game very frustrating. (you'll see someone pausing every 10 seconds or so)
'vanitas vanitatum dixit Ecclesiastes vanitas vanitatum omnia vanitas. '
-Ecclesiastes 1:2

'Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become a universal law of nature'
-Immanuel Kant

'己所不欲，勿施於人。'
-仲尼
回复 引用
举报顶端
1111111
级别: 新手上路
注册时间:
2001-11-21
在线时间:
0小时
发帖:
245
只看该作者 20楼 发表于: 2004-01-22
引用
最初由 emb422 发布


Socialist is "far/extreme left"...

By the way, Victoria is really a great game!!!
However, I am not going to spend any time on that game until I finish my Russian Campaign in Europa Universalis II...


...it is too hard...
I have revolts all over the place...
I create armies just to suppress revolts (this make me #1 in military rating)..
To change the people from labors or farmers to clerks or craftmen are very bothersome.... the computer should do that automatically (but it won't so I have to find the provience and change myself...)

After 37hr, I finally finish 100yr... and prestige is not high enough...for getting #1....
then I use cheat to get to #1...nothing special, no movie, etc.
I think this game is more fun with multiplayer...but the servers always empty
1111111
回复 引用
举报顶端
发帖 回复
« 返回列表
«123»
共3页
上一主题下一主题
快速回复
限150 字节
上一个 下一个