[发现] VBR和CBR

引用

最初由 akito1229 发布

不管怎么说还HY还是一排-V,vbr应该还是要好些

引用

最初由 Recommended encoder settings 发布

Best quality: "archiving"

-b 320. This is the strongest setting for MP3, with the lowest risk of artifacts. With the exception of a few situations, quality is rarely better than the highest VBR profiles described below. However, 'archiving' music using a lossy format like MP3 is never recommended – no matter how transparent the resulting files might be. The alternative is to use Lossless formats like WavPack, FLAC etc. that allow true archiving bit for bit like on original CD.

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=LAME

引用

最初由 [Discussion] List of recommended LAME settings, V2 (for LAME 3.97) 发布

Note: At a given bitrate range, the quality scale usually works to where VBR is higher quality than ABR which is higher quality than CBR (CBR < ABR < VBR in terms of quality). The exception to this is when you choose the highest possible CBR bitrate, which is 320 kbps (--alt-preset insane).

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=32288

说到底，320cbr最高。

说话不能一竿子全打死了。要仔细阅读资料。

或许，我在头帖里面没说清楚吧。。

是在讨论最好，而不是讨论较好。哀哀~

换句话说，是在讨论极限参数，而不是在讨论推荐参数。

因为HA上面认为要压320CBR还不如直接压无损。

哀。。。以上。

ps.其实对于我来说，这些讨论纯属理论范畴了。因为我现在的er6耳塞，160和320都听不出什么差别。个人够用就好。虽然随着设备的提升，洗牌是难免的。

咳咳
看来我坚持320cbr的路线是正确的
(-＿-﹟)
虽然耳朵听不出来,
但是至少从频谱上看,vbr参数出来的频谱和320cbr相比只能用惨不忍睹来形容
320的毕竟看着舒服啊(～o￣▽￣)～o
话说WavPack的320比mp3更加萌啊~~~~

我是伪非
技术派无视我吧~~~~~